When witnessing corruption during a mission, what action aligns with Army values?

• A. Report through proper channels, protect the unit, and follow UCMJ and policies
• B. Ignore and continue mission
• C. Inform the corrupt person and request they stop quietly
• D. Blame the chain of command

Answer: (A)

Observing corruption tests how a soldier acts to uphold integrity and accountability. Acting in line with Army values means addressing misconduct through the proper channels, protecting the unit, and following the UCMJ and applicable policies. This approach ensures the issue is handled by the right authorities, preserves good order and discipline, and provides due process for those involved.

Silence or attempting to handle it informally can let wrongdoing continue and harm the mission and trust within the unit. Trying to privately warn the corrupt person bypasses established processes and isn’t reliable. Blaming the chain of command shifts responsibility instead of pursuing the formal, correct avenues for accountability.